Obama Calls For Collectivized New World Order

That’s right… the words New World Order have again passed his lips… as they did with Bush 41 and as Henry Kissinger predicted in 2008.  Fundamental transformation here we come if we don’t wake-up and get involved immediately.  Governor Sarah Palin posted on her facebook earlier: One in three Americans is talking about Obama’s impeachment.  So what are we waiting for?

By Marion Algier – Ask Marion

“People are anxious…. the old order isn’t holding”

by Paul Joseph Watson – InfoWars – July 25, 2014:

Worldwide socialism? Can you imagine how horrible this would be?

Check it out:

During a fundraiser in Seattle this week, President Barack Obama called for a “new order” based around a collectivized system in order to quell people’s concerns about geopolitical strife and the economy.

“People are anxious. Now, some of that has to do with some big challenges overseas,” said Obama, adding, “But whether people see what’s happening in Ukraine, and Russia’s aggression towards its neighbors in the manner in which it’s financing and arming separatists; to what’s happened in Syria … to the failure in Iraq for Sunni and Shia and Kurd to compromise … to what’s happening in Israel and Gaza….”

“Part of people’s concern is just the sense that around the world the old order isn’t holding and we’re not quite yet to where we need to be in terms of a new order that’s based on a different set of principles, that’s based on a sense of common humanity, that’s based on economies that work for all people. … But here in the United States, what people are also concerned about is the fact that although the economy has done well in the aggregate, for the average person it feels as if incomes, wages just haven’t gone up; that people, no matter how hard they work, they feel stuck.”

In a geopolitical context, Obama’s call for a “new order” really doesn’t sound any different from the old unipolar world order that the United States has represented since the end of the Cold War, which is now being challenged by the rise of the BRICS countries.

Developments over the course of the past year have made it clear that the United States no longer considers Russia to be part of this “new order” as a result of its resistance to NATO encirclement.

In terms of the economy, Obama’s insistence on “economies that work for all people” based on “common humanity” is in direct contradiction to his actual policies, which have almost exclusively served to help Wall Street fat cats while the average American sees their household income decline year after year when adjusted for inflation.

This is by no means the first time that Obama has called for a new world order.

During a 2010 West Point speech, the President encouraged the development of a new “international order” to help secure America’s interests.

Obama also urged Europeans and Americans to embrace the idea of “global citizenship” during a 2012 Berlin speech.

Vice-President Joe Biden has also repeatedly called for a “new world order.”

Framework for world government: from the moment State Department planners in the Roosevelt administration began crafting plans for the United Nations, their goal was always the same: world government.

By: Dennis Behreandt  –  New American  –  Jul 11, 2005  –  h/t to The Right Planet

The United Nations has been portrayed as the world’s most important humanitarian organization. The propaganda supporting this view has been continuous for so long that few doubt the depiction. When disasters such as the devastating Asian tsunami occur, the UN and its pundits are quick to position the world body in the limelight with pronouncements depicting the organization as the leading supplier and coordinator of relief and aid.

Such a picture of the UN as merely a helpful relief and humanitarian agency is dangerously deceptive and inaccurate. It is true that the world body does participate in relief efforts when disasters occur, but this is only the public face of the organization. A clear-eyed survey of the makeup of the UN, though, finds that the world body is much more than a relief organization. It has, for instance, a clearly delineated executive branch in the office of the secretary-general. It has a similarly delineated legislative branch in the General Assembly and Security Council. And it has subsidiaries and affiliates, like the World Court, the nascent International Criminal Court, and certain tribunals, that function as a judiciary branch.

Those familiar with the composition of governing bodies will recognize in this structure the basic framework of government. And this is precisely what the United Nations is and always has been. In fact, from the very moment of its birth during and immediately following the great upheaval of World War II, the true purp6se of the United Nations has been obscured. Born in secrecy while the world convulsed in the violence of war, the founders of the world body, primarily found in the subversive and internationalist ranks of the Council on Foreign Relations, labored to lay the groundwork for world government. The United Nations was designed from the beginning to be the instrument through which they would achieve this dangerous goal.

Keep reading …

Moving us to a New World Order… World Government, was always the Progressive Plan; what Obama meant by the fundamental transformation of America. And the only reason that we aren’t already there is because of patriotic Americans who woke-up and stood-up… the Tea Party, which is why they have been demonized by the ruling elite, and a small group of courageous politicians and alternative media folk including Sarah Palin, Ted Cruz, Glenn Beck, Michele Bachmann, Allen West, Laura Ingraham, Mike Lee, Rand Paul, Alex Jones, Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Dr. Ben Carson, Ron Paul, Sean Hannity, Mark Steyn, Trevor Loudon, Daniel Hannan, Dinesh D’Souza and the like who have all also been demonized by those in power who want to control “you and me”,  the little people.  Those who are ignored or belittled by the mainstream media are exactly who you should be listening to and following, not shunning.