via Secretary of State John Kerry demonstrates why Huma Abedin’s background mattered | Walid Shoebat.
Creeping Sharia: Here we have an example that demonstrates this reality further and it comes via Kenneth Timmerman, who has picked up on the fact that the new Secretary of State – John Kerry – has a son-in-law with family still living in Iran. This reality could conceivably affect how Kerry deals with the Iranians.
Via the Daily Caller:
In a greeting to the Iranian people on the occasion of the traditional New Year (Nowruz) holiday last week, Secretary of State John Kerry exposed a secret that journalists and academics have been agonizing over for the past six weeks: the fact that his daughter has married an Iranian-American who has extensive family ties to Iran.
“I am proud of the Iranian-Americans in my own family, and grateful for how they have enriched my life,” Kerry said in the official statement. Kerry also said he was “strongly committed to resolving” the differences between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran, “to the mutual benefit of both of our people.”
Politicians like to keep their families off-limits to the press, a decorum enforced vigorously when it comes to politicians who are in favor with the national media but ruthlessly discarded for others. But in Kerry’s case, there could be larger ramifications.
Since its inception, the FBI has vetted U.S. government officials involved in national security issues, and it generally won’t grant clearances to individuals who are married to nationals of an enemy nation or have family members living in that country, for fear of divided loyalties or, more simply, blackmail.
There it is. Certainly, even leftists can comprehend this concept without inserting race into their thought processes (oh, wait). Imagine a scenario in which a representative of Iran’s mullahs approaches the State Department with a list of demands that, if not met, could have serious consequences for Kerry’s in-laws living in Iran.
In the current political construct, such demands could conceivably involve the U.S. withholding money, weapons, or aid earmarked for a country like Egypt as tensions in the Middle East escalate. While that may not sound like a bad idea to those of us who understand the threat of the Muslim Brotherhood, shouldn’t our Secretary of State’s sole interest be in lockstep with the interests of the United States?
Off topic but related: Strange bedfellows — Iran and al Qaeda
Related:
"Islam’s flag will be raised above the White House…
Texas: CSCOPE tests students on Islamic sharia
New ad: “This is Islamic Apartheid”
Grand Ayatollah Declares All Christian Women May be Raped
Has John Brennan, Our Next CIA Director, Converted to Islam
Egyptian Magazine Affirms Brotherhood infiltration of White House
Obama’s “Muslim World” Journey and Its Consequences for America
Vetting Obama – “Palling Around With Terrorists”
“Terror TV” and Global Jihad Comes to America
Muslim Brotherhood group to ‘connect all U.S. schools’
The Tipping Point: Embracing the Muslim Brotherhood – Townhall
For Anyone not familiar with Huma Abedin Weiner… a little background:
Anthony Weiner: Mother-in-Law a Member of Muslim Brotherhood
Manifesto Puts Hillary’s Deputy Chief In Middle Of Muslim Plot – Please Read more:
Alert: Hillary Clinton Deputy Chief of Staff Tied to Muslim Brotherhood and Al-Qaeda
You be the judge…
askmarion 
Pingback: It’s A Wrap… Ask Marion – 03-31.13 – Happy Easter and Passover Edition | askmarion
Pingback: Make Room for Islamistgate: The Obama Admin Newest, (Biggest?) Scandal | askmarion
Pingback: Iranian Foreign Minister: We Did Not Agree to Dismantle Anything in Nuclear Program | askmarion
Pingback: Alert: ‘Top Secret’ Documents Implicate Obamas, Clintons | askmarion
Pingback: US Must Arm Muslims Fighting Extremists ‘To the Teeth’ Says Judge Jeanine Pirro as World Leaders Minus Obama and Kerry Gather in Paris | askmarion