A nation of wimps, victims and cowards

Exclusive: Patrice Lewis explains how democracy has led to today’s nanny state…

“There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him.”  – Robert A. Heinlein, “The Moon is a Harsh Mistress”

WND: I waver back and forth between hope and despair for my country. Sometimes – such as when I see the thousands of people flooding gun shows across the nation – I feel great hope. Other times I can’t believe my eyes or ears about how far our country has descended. “And you call yourself an American?” is my mental reply to far too many people.

One such person left a comment on my blog last week. “The whole idea of government,” she wrote (presumably with a straight face), “is to help people when they are down and to give them a leg up towards leveling the playing field of prosperity.”

Oh. My. Gosh. My eyeballs nearly fell out when I read that line. I don’t think I have ever seen a more succinct and concise misunderstanding of the purpose of government in my 50 years of existence on this planet.

If I could point out the single biggest vice Americans have embraced in the last two or three generations, it’s an entitlement mentality. In sharp contrast to the individualist vision of our Founding Fathers, too many people want a nanny state that will care for them from cradle to grave. To guarantee this lifetime of helplessness, these people actually attempt to restructure and re-interpret the Constitution and Bill of Rights to suit their helplessness and ensure the government will get involved in every aspect of our lives to “help people when they are down” and “level the playing field of prosperity.”

Rather than recognize the true purpose of government – to safeguard the individual rights given to us by our Creator (and by “safeguard” I don’t mean “take away”) – Americans have come to misunderstand what a right is.

When my blog reader said the purpose of government is to “help people when they’re down and … level the playing field of prosperity,” what she really meant was “something must be involuntarily taken (stolen) from one person and given to another person.” Believe me, that is NOT the purpose of government. Yes, that’s what government does; but that doesn’t make it right.

When did America become a nation of wimps, victims, cowards and helpless children? Why can’t people see the need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps and work their tails off and achieve success through own merit? If the government would butt out, success would be far more possible. And by “butt out,” I mean it from both ends of the spectrum. Stop the entitlements on one end, and stop the backroom sweetheart deals to banks and big corporations on the other end. Let everyone make it on his own merit, and use (private) charities for those who can’t.

It seems there is very little in America today that the government wouldn’t be delighted to take over, up to and including responsibility for any bad decisions we make. Rather than owning up to our mistakes, we have become a society that blames others for our own bad decisions, then demands a bailout. People prefer a nanny state. They want someone else to pay for bringing up their fatherless babies; to fund their overpriced college educations; to absorb the cost of inflated mortgages; to provide them with food and housing and cell phones and Internet service. Anything else? Caviar perhaps? A Ferrari? Free health care? Oh wait …

In other words, too many people want equality of outcome (leveling the playing field) rather than equality of opportunity.

Remember, since the government doesn’t produce anything (except threats), it can only take at the point of a gun. Government takes from those who have worked hard to earn something and gives it to those who haven’t. This is known as “leveling the playing field of prosperity.” And as Dan Cofall noted, “The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.”

This of course is why our Founding Fathers gave us a republic and not a democracy. The differences are critical. A democracy is Rule by Omnipotent Majority. “The Majority’s power is absolute and unlimited; its decisions are unappealable under the legal system established to give effect to this form of government. This opens the door to unlimited Tyranny-by-Majority.”

But a republic’s purpose “is to control the Majority strictly, as well as all others among the people, primarily to protect the Individual’s God-given, unalienable rights and therefore for the protection of the rights of the Minority, of all minorities, and the liberties of people in general.”

Right now America is illegally acting too much like a democracy, where half the population has economically enslaved the other half through their professional victimhood. This is because too many people have been taught that the purpose of government is “help people when they are down” and “level the playing field of prosperity.”

Another reader on my blog wrote, “Just because one is less fortunate, does not mean they are helpless. The system we currently have is making it easier to become dependent, and I see it everywhere where I live. [Government] programs are just making the problem worse … huge swaths of cities [are] doing it, on purpose. Ever heard of a bunch of teenage girls talking about getting pregnant on purpose when they’re 16 so they can get money from the government? I have, and my sister who works for the local police department sees this as a troubling trend, and that’s just the tip of the iceberg of what she’s exposed to every day.”

This – this! – is what America has become. We were once a proud nation of doers; now we’re a helpless nation of takers. And nothing will change unless and until the Nanny State is dismantled and we are once again allowed to stand on our own two feet and use our own charity to help those who can’t.

Remember: The government isn’t your friend, your parent, or your nanny. It is, at best, a necessary evil whose role is to perform a few very select and enumerated functions … and those functions do NOT include helping people when they are down or leveling the playing field of prosperity.

By Patrice Lewis – a freelance writer whose latest book is The Simplicity Primer She is co-founder (with her husband) of a home woodcraft business. The Lewises live on 20 acres in north Idaho with their two homeschooled children…

About Ask Marion

I am a babyboomer and empty nester who savors every moment of my past and believes that it is the responsibility of each of us in my generation and Americans in general to make sure that America is as good or even a better place for future generations as it was for us. So far... we haven't done very well!! Favorite Quotes: "The first 50 years are to build and acquire; the second 50 are to leave your legacy"; "Do something that scares you every day!"; "The journey in between what you once were and who you are becoming is where the dance of life really takes place". At age 62 I find myself fighting inoperable uterine Cancer and thanks to the man upstairs and the prayers from so many people including many of my readers from AskMarion and JustOneMorePet... I'm beating it. After losing our business because of the economy and factors related to the re-election of President Obama in 2012 followed by 16-mos of job hunting, my architect-trained husband is working as a trucker and has only been home approximately 5-days a month since I was diagnosed, which has made everything more difficult and often lonely... plus funds are tight. Our family medical deductible is 12K per year for two of us; thank you ObamaCare. But thanks to donations from so many of you, we are making ends meet as I go through treatment while taking care of my father-in-law who is suffering from late stage Alzheimer's and my mother-in-law who suffers from RA and onset dementia as well as hearing loss, for which there are no caretaker funds, as I continue the fight here online to inform and help restore our amazing country. And finally I need to thank a core group of family, friends, and readers... all at a distance, who check in with me regularly. Plus, I must thank my furkids who have not left my side through this fight. You can see them at JustOneMorePet.
This entry was posted in Choices, Dumbing Down of America, Freedom, Off the Grid, Wake Up, You Be the Judge and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to A nation of wimps, victims and cowards

  1. Vance Craig says:

    Under the Gillard Government, Australia’s trade policy will be driven by ongoing productivity-raising domestic reform coupled with the negotiation of improved access for exporters to overseas markets. The best trade policy is domestic economic reform designed to boost the productivity and international competitiveness of Australian businesses. Improved access to overseas markets will be sought not on the basis of preferential treatment but as an opportunity to compete on level terms with other countries. Negotiations will seek the maximum possible opening of markets but Australia will not hold back on domestic reform if other governments refuse to reform their economies. Far from being a necessary evil in bargaining for better market access abroad, domestic reform will be pursued in Australia in its own right and for its own benefits.

  2. We as Republicans have to accept that government number crunching, even conservative number crunching, is not the answer to our nation’s problems.


  4. idebenone says:

    At the international level, the 2008 study by La Porta and Schleifer contemplates the “informal” firms operating in gray or black markets, who intentionally avoid scale in order to avoid detection, and therefore lag in productivity gains, have trouble financing growth, and seldom mature into larger firms. For those countries, larger – i.e., formal – is better, but obviously these reasons don’t apply to the U.S. economy. We also suspect that in many of those countries, national wealth is skewed by the large (often government-run) operations who extract natural resources. Any nation that favors its large corporations will indeed see less wealth created by its small businesses. Over the long term it will see less wealth created, period.

  5. Pingback: Sunday Links: Facebook Friends Pictures Edition, Volume 53

  6. “Holy crap, I love this book! It’s smart, entertaining and best of all, made me re-think my life and my business. That’s a winning combination I find irresistible. Don’t hesitate to buy this book and put it to use in every aspect of your life.” — Larry Winget Five-time NYT/WSJ bestselling author, including the #1 bestseller, Shut Up, Stop Whining And Get A Life!

  7. piracetam says:

    The restraints on the trade of North American colonies were significantly less onerous than those imposed on most other colonies. By allowing access to world markets for their goods, trade greatly enlarges the markets for colonial goods and encourages all manner of production well beyond that which could be absorbed within the small colonial markets themselves. & Most important are property rights – not just to hold land but to dispose of it as the owner wishes. European restraints on alienation – such as primogeniture and limitations on the property rights that can be acquired – greatly hinder economic development outside the North American colonies. & Low taxes also greatly encourage development. With Great Britain picking up all of the expenses of defense – something it was then trying unsuccessfully to get the colonies to contribute to – the cost of government in the English North American colonies was extraordinarily cheap – and yet the quality of government was clearly superior. The colonies of the other European states were burdened with heavier taxes – and yet were subjected to wasteful and ineffective government. They were also burdened by tithes and other obligations to established clerisies. & Smith compares North American colonial governments most favorably with the “absolutist” governments of the colonies of other European states.

  8. Idebenone says:

    Child sport fields, on educational land is not recorded as “Open Space”, and is not protected by Open Space legislation. However any change of use of educational land requires local or national government approval. The government decisions can be contested by the local community.

  9. Pingback: The Weekly Wrap… Ask Marion | askmarion

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s