Why Justice Clarence Thomas Should Not (Needn’t) Recuse Himself… and Why Justice Elena Kagan Should (Must)

gty supreme court class thg 111116 wblog Groups Suggest Elena Kagan, Clarence Thomas Should Be Recused from Health Law Challenge

Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

This question is all about politics, not ethics: If neither Thomas or his wife has a “fiduciary interest” in the case, Justice Thomas is in the clear, says Doug Mataconis in Outside the Beltway. But this isn’t about legal ethics, it’s an attempt to “deflect attention” from Sen. Orrin Hatch’s call for liberal Justice Elena Kagan to recuse herself because of her previous work as Obama’s Solicitor General. And unlike the Democrats’ “phony” case against Thomas, Hatch has “at least an argument” that Kagan should sit this out.
“House Democrats call on Justice Thomas to recuse himself…”

Let’s leave all spouses alone: “I get that this is mostly just rhetorical jousting,” since Thomas won’t recuse himself voluntarily and nobody can make him, says Kevin Drum in Mother Jones. But either way, “it’s a bad idea” to argue that “judges’ spouses need to be apolitical creatures or that judges are responsible for what their spouses do.” That hurts women a lot more than men, and if it’s true, why not ban all lawmakers’ spouses from political activism, too?
“Keep spouses out of it”

Justice Elena Kagan was directly involved, herself, with ObamaCare. So, Justice Kagen Should Recuse Herself From ObamaCare Case This is 100% different from the Clarence Thomas situation.

Excerpt:

Federal law requires Supreme Court justices to recuse from a case if they had earlier “participated as counsel” in the case. Justice Kagan did just that when she was Obama’s solicitor general, but has never explained why she believes she is nevertheless justified in sitting on the case under this standard.

Carlson: Ginni Thomas Will Not Interview Or Write About Business Clients

Last week Tucker Carlson, who just hired Ginni Thomas for staff on the Daily Caller, said the same thing on Hannity.  He said he saw no reason for Justice Thomas to recuse himself unless the Thomas’s are receiving fiduciary compensation. (In recent weeks, the site has picked up some high-profile new employees, including former Slate and Newsweek blogger Mickey Kaus.)

Thomas is no political shrinking violet. She’s made her name most recently as a conservative advocate and de facto lobbyist — publicly offering her services to clients of the advocacy group Liberty Central and its partner the Patrick Henry Center for Individual Liberty. She’s the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, vocally opposes the health care reform law, and worked in 2010 to elect Republicans to Congress.  But many (maybe most) in Washington are married to people who are in one way or another involved or working either in one of the 3-branches of government, in support or lobbying concerns, CIA or FBI or security related departments or in the media.

The only way that Justice Thomas would be required to recuse himself under this canon would be if his wife has a fiduciary interest of some kind in the outcome of the litigation or if she falls under one of the provisions of subsection (d). The fact that she may be affiliated with a Tea Party group that has taken a position on the Affordable Care Act is not, in and of itself, sufficient to meet the requirements of Canon 3(C)(1), and anyone with a modicum of training in legal ethics would know that.

Recusal is on a case by case basis and unfortunately up to the judge to recuse themselves.  However in this case… the Obama administration knew of the conflict with Kagan and her recusal should have been provision of her confirmation.

The upcoming decision on ObamaCare is not only over changing the quality of healthcare in America, it is about how much power the government has (will have) over Americans to make us buy whatever they choose, if this is not over-turned.  It will also give the federal government control over one-sixth of the budget of the United States.  Look at their record… does anyone believe they are capable of that responsibility? Just like social security now… in the not so distant future there will be no money in the coffers for anyone’s (but a chosen few) to get healthcare… let alone decent healthcare or anything like what Americans have now.

Kagan was a guaranteed vote for the White House for the administration in case the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act ended up there.  Kagan is ineligible to vote on this case and the White House always knew that.  But the Congress did not do their job….

Kagan should (must) recuse herself.  Thomas should (need) not. Some pressure from the other judges might help… Encourage them!

Ask Marion~

Related:

The Agenda Project:  Supreme Control

Kagen: Liberal Supreme

Judiciary Committee Probes Kagan’s Role in ObamaCare at GOP’s Request

Elena Kagan Tied to Obama’s Birth Certificate

Papers Prepared to Disbar Kagan

Video: The Other Barak? (Aharon Barak)

Video: Kagan: Constitution Was Meant To Be “Interpreted Over Time” from RCP Video on Vimeo.

Source:  True Health is True Wealth

Advertisements

About Ask Marion

I am a babyboomer and empty nester who savors every moment of my past and believes that it is the responsibility of each of us in my generation and Americans in general to make sure that America is as good or even a better place for future generations as it was for us. So far... we haven't done very well!! Favorite Quotes: "The first 50 years are to build and acquire; the second 50 are to leave your legacy"; "Do something that scares you every day!"; "The journey in between what you once were and who you are becoming is where the dance of life really takes place". At age 62 I find myself fighting inoperable uterine Cancer and thanks to the man upstairs and the prayers from so many people including many of my readers from AskMarion and JustOneMorePet... I'm beating it. After losing our business because of the economy and factors related to the re-election of President Obama in 2012 followed by 16-mos of job hunting, my architect-trained husband is working as a trucker and has only been home approximately 5-days a month since I was diagnosed, which has made everything more difficult and often lonely... plus funds are tight. Our family medical deductible is 12K per year for two of us; thank you ObamaCare. But thanks to donations from so many of you, we are making ends meet as I go through treatment while taking care of my father-in-law who is suffering from late stage Alzheimer's and my mother-in-law who suffers from RA and onset dementia as well as hearing loss, for which there are no caretaker funds, as I continue the fight here online to inform and help restore our amazing country. And finally I need to thank a core group of family, friends, and readers... all at a distance, who check in with me regularly. Plus, I must thank my furkids who have not left my side through this fight. You can see them at JustOneMorePet.
This entry was posted in Economy and Money, Health and wellness, Knowledge Is Power, Politics, Wake Up, Watch the Other Hand and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Why Justice Clarence Thomas Should Not (Needn’t) Recuse Himself… and Why Justice Elena Kagan Should (Must)

  1. Pingback: Meet the ObamaCare Mandate Committee | askmarion

  2. Pingback: March 23rd Second Anniversary of ObamaCare… March 26th a Future Day in American Infamy? | askmarion

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s