Was the controversial “The Innocence of Muslims” film a false flag operation designed to undermine freedom of expression in the West?
A rather interesting article on the issue of the authorship of the film has recently been published by Walid Shoebat.  In many ways the article makes a lot of sense. Please take some time to read his essay which can be found HERE.
The video which resulted in rampaging mobs running around the streets in opposition to freedom of expression has resulted in Western leaders giving only a lukewarm defense of freedom of expression. It seems that the video could turn out to be the excuse for Western governments to finally give in to the demands of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) for a global blasphemy law. This is despite the fact that freedom of expression is what guarantees freedom of religion. Falling back to the human rights ‘standards’ of some OIC member states will do nothing to serve either freedom, but it will allow governments to clamp down on dissent!
The last riots on this scale took place during the “Danish Cartoons Crisis” and for similar reasons. Those events ushered in increased suppression of freedom of expression in the West. Perhaps the Muslim Brotherhood and their fellow travellers thought that was time to diminish freedom of expression still further using similar tactics. The Danish Cartoons were published on 30 September 2005, but the protests did not break out until January and February 2006.  It seems that the lack of spontaneity was the result of the tour by Danish Imams in the Middle East who deliberately stirred things up. 
After the way the Danish Cartoons riots were orchestrated it would come as no surprise if the “Innocence of Muslims” film was the product of a false flag operation. Was it actually a project of the Muslim Brotherhood? Were Western Governments who proved to be very effective allies of the Muslim Brotherhood in the ‘Arab Spring’ involved in some way? Both seemed to have a lot to gain from the film, and both seem now to be pushing for payment. Of course such ‘theories’ are mere speculation at this time, but they are certainly compelling when you look about who stands to gain.
Mr. Shoebat, himself a former member of the Muslim Brotherhood, certainly has a unique perspective on their operations. Even though he has turned his back on them and become a peace activist his insights are still valid, he knows how they think and how they work. It is good that the Western world has an informed person like Mr. Shoebat to shine light onto these matters.
In his essay, Walid Shoebat considers the motivations of the film maker(s) and makes the following important point:
“Why would any anti-Islam Christian or even Jewish activist want the destruction of his own? It makes zero sense, unless of course this person intends to do harm to his real enemies—Israel and the Copts.” 
The plight of the Copts is something that ICLA is deeply concerned about. The Copts are the descendants of the Ancient Egyptians. Since the Islamic conquest of Egypt their proportion of the population has declined dramatically and today are a persecuted minority in their own country. Their plight has got even worse in the aftermath of the Western supported ‘Sharia Spring.’ Why then would a person of a purportedly Coptic background make matters even worse for his kith and kin back in Egypt? Of course Western politicians have not used the film as an opportunity to make statements about the mistreatment of the Copts. They are too busy making excuses for the violent mobs who prowl the streets – it is clear that Western politicians don’t give a damn about religious minorities in the Islamic world!
Mr. Shoebat concludes his article as follows:
“The results of this entire fiasco will not be the apprehension of terrorists, but the continual chipping away at the First-Amendment, since Americans by and large are still practicing the art of self-blame while they ignore the real culprits who enter our country with the intent of doing it much harm.” 
The implications of what is revealed in the Shoebat article opens up the possibility that contradictions and clandestine skulduggery are being kept from public view. Again we ask the question – Cui Prodest?
As Obama and Ahmadinejad sing from the same choir book
Ever the Artful Dodger of Politics, President Barack Hussein Obama was a one-day wonder at this year’s perfectly useless UN General Assembly.
Just one day later, the uncrowned King of the World has been pushed off the front page by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who says New World Order is needed to get away from US dominance.
“Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Tuesday that a new world order needs to emerge, away from years of what he called American bullying and domination.” (FoxNews, Sept. 26, 2012.)
Were it not for height and beard, Obama and Ahmadinejad would be one and the same.
The day before Obama told the UN Assembly: “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam” and “Let us remember that Muslims have suffered the most at the hands of extremism.” The millions slaughtered by radical Islam over the centuries got no mention, let alone a requiem, in the ramblings of this Hollywood-manufactured Pocket Messiah.
Though surprisingly eclipsed by news headlines when the media carried the words of Ahmadinejad full tilt, Obama and the Iranian president are both singing harmoniously from the same choir book.
Both Obama and Ahmadinejad make political careers out of marketing an image of America the Bully, an America that must pay.
The biggest news ignored by the mainstream media is that the UN, the Muslim Brotherhood and the socialists are now working in concert to deliver One World Government on a largely suspecting global population.
The only difference between the American president and the Iranian one is that the one who hails from the Mid-East is front and centre about what he wants. If ‘The Enemy Big Satan’ is crazy enough to give him a platform right in the Big Apple, then he’ll use it full scale.
Ahmadinejad comes right out and calls his mission One World Government, dodging from patriots in the cover of shadow, Obama calls his the “Fundamental Transformation of America”.
Ahmadinejad, finishing out his last term, has nothing to lose. Obama, facing a reelection bid within 41 days, has to be a lot more coy and to coach his terms, formulated for second guessing.
Despicable though he is, Ahmadinejad has bigger stones than the coy and cowardly Obama. Tough guy talk is easy to blare when you’ve already bowed to most Muslim leaders and framed your take on countries like Egypt in a heard-the-world-over speech. The bravest thing Barack Obama ever did was marry the overbearing Michelle LaVaughn Robinson.
Obama lobs all his bombs at the USA from the safety of lofty double entendre speeches and when he’s played out by golf, shooting hoops and other forms of recreation, doubles back to the Michelle/Valerie Jarrett coddle nest.
Sensible people can torture themselves by asking why the Manhattan headquartered United Nations provides a platform to enemies of the state, but for Obama it’s a convenient foil for distraction, better even than appearances with “the girls” on The View.
While Obama was waxing diplomatic at Turtle Bay, it was revealed that he had gifted Hispanic farmers and downtrodden women $1.33 billion—effective immediately—from an over strained public purse.
Hardworking, sun-up-to-sun-down farmers cut off from water in California now know how the families of loved ones massacred in the name of radical Islam must feel.
This is the time line in our upside down world in the last two days alone: Obama and Ahmadinejad were holding the floor at the UN General Assembly, Ahmadinejad, who will return today, on Yom Kippur.
At about the same time Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney was paying handsome compliments to Bill Clinton (God help us) a few blocks away over at at the Global Initiative.
Why Mitt would venture into the enemy camp during a time when Dem trolls work so feverishly to frame him in the “they’re-all-the-same” category is a question only Romney’s campaign manager can answer.
Dreading the evil alternative, the Rooting for Romney crowd have no choice but to try to forget that their man Mitt went willingly into the enemy camp and will be there for him on November 6.
The entire world’s a stage and like the actors with alleged dubbed over lines in the trailer “Innocence of Muslims”, some of us are trying not to be part of the play.
Copyright © Canada Free Press
1. Innocence of Muslims Film was Made by Terrorists (Walid Shoebat)
2. Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy (Wikipedia)